It’s been a while since my last entry. I’ve been busy changing my job,
studying, taking care of my relationship, repairing my car and doing other
economics-related activities.
For this entry I want to talk about the continent that isn’t in the
news. The continent which contains high potential for rapid economic growth but
also many obstacles for this growth. The world's second-largest and
second-most-populous continent. The continent on which the mankind was born.
The continent on which Toto and Shakira have sung beautiful ballads. Africa.
Africa has been one of the biggest centers of economic activity since
the golden days of industrialization. The United Kingdom, France, Spain, Portugal,
Belgium, Italy and Germany started to invade the African countries in the hope
for cheap labor and raw materials during colonialization in the 19th
Century. Even today Africa still remains one of the biggest exporters of raw
materials such as diamonds, oil, coffee, gold and copper.
Like the all developing countries, the countries in Africa have been in
the interest of modern foreign direct investments and multinational
corporations for a long time. Yet to be developed markets and economies of
Africa offer multinational corporations high potential to growth and to gain
revenue and influence on their business.
Already few years back during my economics-classes I wrote a commentary
on how many multinational corporations such as Google, for instance, have been
investing heavily in Nairobi, the capital of Kenya. These reasons include
development of infrastructure, strong internal market, accessibility to better
natural resources, better macroeconomic policies and the increased quality of
labor. All the factors mentioned attract FDI and multinational corporations
into Nairobi. MNC’s would have better accessibilities to growing markets such
as Nairobi, where the middle class has been estimated as 30 million consumers.
Let’s us first consider what this kind of an increase in investments
means for a country like Kenya. Figure 1.0 shows us the situation, where the
interventionist supply-side policies of the government of Kenya have shifted
the long-run aggregate supply curve to the right. These policies can be for
example the provision and maintenance of infrastructure and investment in human
capital to increase the quality and quantity of labor.
As we can see, the economy’s real output has grown from Y1 to Y2 and
thus economic growth has occurred. The economy produces now in the output of Y2
and in the average price level of P2. In the diagram we use the new classical
long-run average supply curve and suppose that the economy is working at full
employment in its level of output. That’s why the LRAS-curve is presented as perfectly
inelastic.
Let us see what happens next. The improvements in the aggregate supply
have also decreased the average price level from P1 to P2 and thus the inflation
decreases. The lower price level, lower rate of inflation and the improvements
in the aggregate supply attract now more foreign direct investment into
Nairobi. Since investment is one component of the aggregate demand, the total number
of goods and services demanded in an economy will increase and AD will thus
shift from AD1 to AD2 as we can see from Figure 2. It seems that this kind of a
situation is a win for the multinational corporations and for the developing
country.
However, to attain these kinds of supply-side policies and economic
growth require peaceful and stable circumstances. There exist several argued
pitfalls for the economic growth and stability in Africa.
The first problem is the current political instability in the African states.
We all have read from the news about the revolutions, mutinies and wars across
Libya and Egypt and not to mention the horrors of Boko Haram in the central
Africa. Also in the Republic of South Africa, the remains of Apartheid are
still remembered. All these kinds of actions and pressures coming from the
western world are causing political instability currently in Africa. Achieving
the conditions for economic development will demand political stability to the
African states. How to achieve that, is a whole different story.
The second common problem is transfer pricing. Transfer pricing happens
when a subsidiary of the firm is selling goods and processes within the
enterprise, for example for the parent company. In practice, this means tax-avoidance
and profit shifting in a hope to attribute the net profit before tax in the
country where the corporation is operating. This is currently a major issue in
Africa and OECD has been setting regulations for years to stop this kind of
transfer pricing.
The third and highly argued matter is the development aid. Several
research suggests that there appears to be no significant correlation between
the level of aid given to Africa and the growth of GDP. Also long-term
provision of food aid may force down domestic prices in the agricultural
sector, which harms the economic growth even more. The nature of the aid given
for Africa should be assessed very carefully to support the conditions for
economic growth, although the humanitarian aid is considered very important in
the countries with critical conditions.
Even though the conditions mentioned would be achieved, there would
still be no guarantee that the foreign direct investment would increase
employment and economic growth in Africa. Although FDI may provide more
employment to the economy, the MNC’s might still outsource their own educated
staff to the country to work for the company.
If the governments in Africa wish to avoid possible negative effects
of the FDI, they must ensure the provision of domestic employment in the
multinational corporations and to ensure that the taxation system is efficient
enough to prevent the transfer pricing. Also the nature and the amount of
development aid should be assessed very carefully to not to harm the domestic
production. With these conditions, Africa could be the next big engine of
rapid, global economic growth.
And most of all, if we want to bless the rains down in Africa, Africa requires political stability. And we shouldn't force it down everyone's throats with 9K720 Iskander missiles.
Text: SW
Pictures don't belong to me
And most of all, if we want to bless the rains down in Africa, Africa requires political stability. And we shouldn't force it down everyone's throats with 9K720 Iskander missiles.
Text: SW
Pictures don't belong to me
No comments:
Post a Comment