The Masterplan

Tesla. The laudable name that stands for innovation, reputation and legend. A company named after the great and praised scientist Nikola Tesla automatically creates enormous expectations towards itself. Since its establishment in 2003, Tesla has been on a way to reclaim its expectations and to create innovations that could change the lives of the mankind for good. Just like its paragon Nikola Tesla did on the 20th Century.

The vision of Tesla Motors is to accelerate the advent of sustainable transport by bringing mass-produced, stylish and desirable electric cars to the market. Not only the firm aims to produce electric cars but also accelerate the research on the use of sustainable energy sources from example through solar panels. In July 2016, Tesla Motors announced buying american provider of solar energy services in a hope to create a symbiosis with solar energy and sustainable transportation.

The founder of PayPal and SpaceX, American billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk currently stands as the CEO, the Chairman of the Board and the front-image of Tesla Motors. Musk as a highly-innovative, and a enthusiastic supervillian has a vision of changing the world: This comes clear from his so-called "Master Plans" with Tesla Motors.

I warmly recommend you all to read Elon Musk's first Master Plan from 2006, The Secret Tesla Motors Master Plan (just between you and me) from the corporate website. But since you all probably aren't that particularly interested in the details, I'm glad to refer: The first Master Plan mostly introduced the idea of producing stylish, desirable and efficient electric performance-cars for the market. The kind of models that people can afford and want to buy. As far as I'm concerned, the plan has gone so far so good. Just take a look at for example the Tesla Model S. With a design and performance like that, who wouldn't like to cruise around with a car like that without creating any emissions.

The price for a Model S stands currently somewhere on 100,00€. So yeah, it's pretty expensive.

However, on March 2016 Tesla introduced a new, cheaper model called Model 3 that would cost only 50,000€. The car would in that case challenge the BMW 3-series and Audi A4-series as the automotive of the middle-class and would bring the stylish electric cars available for a bigger margin of consumers. Just like the first Master Plan stated. The car will be available on 2017 and so far the car has already 400 000 pre-orders.

The ambition of Tesla Motors is building up on Musk's Master Plan, Part Deux. The second Master Plan introduces the integration of solar energy generation and storage through personal transportation, the creation of more efficient power-plants, broadening of Tesla models to heavy-duty trucks and high passenger-density urban transport, the autonomy of transportation (self-driving cars) and car-sharing between consumers when the car is not being used.

This all sounds very wonderful sci-fi-stuff so is it too good to become reality? Can one company through research and development find ease to the looming energy crisis and break down the dominance of fossil-fuels as a means of production and fuel? The Master Plans themselves don't give much information or data concerning the implementation of these ideas. One could of course crunch the numbers behind these theories and calculate some physics in order to find out the realities, but I will leave that on everyone's personal consideration, since this blog focuses more on the economics than physics. If someone has performed some calculations, feel free to post a comment.

So should you really invest in Tesla? That is actually the question I've been thinking about the past weeks. Tesla Motors is a company of the future and the sales could boom in a way like never before on 2017 when the Model 3 becomes available, so the decision would seem to be an easy one. However, the biggest question is that can Tesla really answer to the enormous and yet increasing demand for its product? Can Tesla provide enough cars to prevent long waiting periods of the product and to maintain its customer satisfaction? Can Tesla produce this great amount of products with enough quality to avoid massive recall-maintenance and common faults?

Nevertheless, Tesla has already proved being a massive competitor in the car-market. It's interesting to see if Musk's Master Plans become reality and if Tesla becomes a great influence on the energy-market as well.

One Tesla changed the world 130 years ago. I really hope that another one does it again.

Text: SW

Pictures don't belong to me

Cash Is King

The financial sector and especially the banking sector are experiencing huge transformations in the need to keep up with the modern digitalization. During the past week, the biggest financial service group in Scandinavia, Nordea, announced to charge from extra withdrawals and to abandon the usage of its classic cardboard code cards used in its netbank in Finland. Instead, people are forced to use an app or a free device for those who don't own a smartphone to log in.

In Finland, especially Nordea has fell behind from the technological innovations in the financial sector: OP has developed a highly popular app called Pivo, on which a consumer can examine his/her account actions and Danske Bank developed a MobilePay-app, which makes transactions possible through mobile. Even though its motto states "We will make it happen", Nordea still is waiting for its next big innovation.

It is clear that these kinds of reforms concerning the charges on withdrawals and the usage of netbank will cause anxiety. But what we are missing from these reforms, is that banking is experiencing a huge change caused by the digitalization. The banks must adapt to the changing environment to service their customers in the most efficient way. Concerning the adaptation to the digitalized future of banking, Nordea is one step ahead from its competitors.

Not only digitalization makes the banking sector experiencing reforms, but also the current world we live in. The world we live in, is the world with negative interest rates.

I've had many questions on could there exist negative deposit rates of interest. The answer is yes. I can almost guarantee that in a couple years or so, you have to pay to keep your money on your bank account. That's how negative interest rates work. When the interest rates are negative, the bank encourages you to invest and consume more and save less. What would be more convenient way to increase investments and consumption that charge from saving.

Not only the idea is radical, odd and questionable, but there exists one major concern for this scenario: cash. If cash is available, people will of course withdraw their money and save it on their mattress so they don't have to pay for their savings. This will of course cause a bank run and easily a new financial crisis.

However, since the 1990's, economists and experts have been waiting for the disappearance of cash. With the current pace of developing technological innovations, it is a question of time when cash disappears. But would the effects of the disappearance be severe? And could it be even possible? What potential problems would rise?

Let us first consider, how cash would disappear. One possible scenario is that the central bank stops printing money and the banks will buy all the notes from the economy by giving the amount of the notes to bank accounts. This will of course cause the collection of cash. But the bank could buy these notes of course with a slight premium (like bonds) and thus the market prices of the notes will go up and thus the deposit property would replace the notes as means of payment, So in the end, the removal of cash would not in theory would cause severe damage.

Business-to-consumer payments can be easily dealt with account transfers and payment terminals and mostly are done in the Nordic countries, where the usage of debit and credit cards has passed the usage of cash years ago. In Sweden, you can even buy a newspaper from a hobo with a debit card!

Also consumer-to-consumer transactions might not be as hard to organize. Could you imagine to buy a used car from a stranger without cash? It can be arranged either through account transfer or even MobilePay-kind of technology that allows the transactions of big amounts. Other option would be to develop more personal iZettle-type of technologies, that would allow card payments through personal payment terminals.

The action mentioned above and other transactions as well however demand trust from the partners of the transaction. That is one of the reasons that cash maintains its popularity: it is common, familiar, traceable and trustworthy.

Also the other problem arising from the disappearance of cash are the groups who cant afford or cant have a bank account nor a card. In this case one possible solution would be that the banks would establish bank accounts and give bank cards to everyone free of charge. That sounds pretty far-fetched but not completely impossible.

As stated above, innovations like Pivo, MobilePay and iZettle are already transforming the banking sector. The disappearance of cash is most certainly to come one day, but when, I don't know. But what I know, is that account transfers are already more popular forms of payment than cash in parts of Europe. As a closing statement, some statistics are illustrated below.

As we can see, during 2015, only 29 % of all payments were made with cash in Finland. In countries like Greece, Italy and Bulgaria where the existence of the black market is considerable, the cash maintains its strength. This also arises the question of the disappearance of cash as a way to fight against the black markets. But I might handle the black market more thoroughly probably in some other blog.

We are not far away to abandon cash. The abandonment might not cause any major concerns or anxiety and can even cause benefits for the economy. But as for now, when the technology still doesn't completely justify the disappearance of cash, cash is king.

Text: SW
Pictures don't belong to me